x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by rosalind renshaw

The Firstbuy Direct scheme announced in the Budget has come under fire in Parliament.

Intended to help first-time buyers get on the property ladder, economists told the Treasury Select Committee that it would actually make things worse.

Jonathan Portes, director of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR), said that Firstbuy Direct was a measure that would “exacerbate economic distortions and make things worse over the long run”.

He said: “House prices in the UK are too high and that has all kinds of damaging economic and social impacts. The main financial impact of giving help to first-time buyers is to pump extra money into the demand side and boost house prices.

“That’s the last thing future first-time buyers or the economy as a whole needs.”

Roger Bootle, managing director of Capital Economics, also gave evidence to the committee.

Asked by the chairman Andrew Tyrie what housing measures he would have introduced, Bootle replied: “I certainly would not have done this scheme to boost the position of first-time buyers.

“This is simply increasing demand and in the process doing nothing at all to ease the housing shortage in this country.

“There might well have been more aggressive moves that could have been made on the planning system.

“This is a supply problem. If we want to ease the shortage of houses, we’ve got to make sure more houses are built.”

Agents have also criticised the measure. Eric Walker, of Bushells in London, said it was like putting a sticking plaster on a broken leg, whilst David Newnes of LSL warned that the scheme was a ‘fig leaf’ to cover the real problem of economic uncertainty.

He also said that new-build houses were more expensive than secondhand ones, and were therefore not necessarily the best option for first-time buyers.

*The shares of housebuilder Barratt Developments rose strongly yesterday – up almost 7% and fuelling criticism that the Firstbuy Direct scheme is a ‘Barratt bonanza’.

Comments

  • icon

    This situation has a lot to do with supply & demand of housing stock. If the government had the bottle to introduce a rental price cap, thus making renting a cheap option (a la France), then less people would want to buy a house and there wouldn't be the demand from Landlords to buy up the limited number of houses that FTBs wish to buy, thus driving up the prices until the FTB is priced out of the market. At the moment Landlord's are stiffling the market by competing against FTBs in order to snap up the housing stock and take advantage of high rental yields!

    • 01 April 2011 14:35 PM
  • icon

    The builders will have a field day and the FTBs will have negative equity. I don't envy the govt at this time at all. The issue is a thorny one and the banks are still seating pretty.

    • 28 March 2011 10:32 AM
  • icon

    At least the scheme is only for brand new houses. So the policy will help increase the number of homes and not just support the price of houses.

    • 25 March 2011 10:57 AM
  • icon

    It concerns me that this scheme will encourage young first time buyers to pay over the odds for a new house, especially when new houses are known to cost about 10% more than their value (a "builder's premium", if you like). So they might instantly be in negative equity, whether they realise it or not.

    This seems to help housebuilders immensely, and seems to be pushing first time buyers into a life of debt, albeit some of that debt at a low interest rate.

    • 25 March 2011 10:34 AM
  • icon

    A recent report linked child poverty to high house prices and rents.
    Reducing rents and house prices will help reduce the levels of child poverty.
    It'd also be good for the general economy too - as less money spent on rent or mortgage means more money to spend in the wider economy.

    • 25 March 2011 10:23 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal