x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by rosalind renshaw

A new and permanent reform of stamp duty would mean that the tax would be paid by sellers and not buyers.

The call for reform has come from HSBC which found that 85% of non home-owning young adults (18 to 34-years-old) want to own their own home, but only 19% of the 85% expect to be able to do so within the next five years.

And almost half – 45% of aspiring home-owners – do not ever expect to be able to purchase.

In its report, First Time Buyers: Roadblocks and Ways Forward, HSBC found that the younger, 18 to 24-year-old age group was the more optimistic.

Around 22% expect to purchase within five years. However, 21% do not expect ever to be able to purchase.

For each of the past three years there have been around 200,000 first-time buyers, according to the Council of Mortgage Lenders. This is less than half of the 400,000 to 500,000 of those recorded in more typical market conditions, before the credit crunch hit.

The key reasons holding aspiring home owners back from house purchase are:

69% cited “raising the required deposit”
59% cited “insufficient income to support the mortgage.”
27% said “concerns over unemployment”
12% said “concern over future falling house prices”

The current average FTB house price of £136,842 is 6.6 times a young single person’s average earnings of £20,654 (source: Nationwide Building Society and National Earnings Survey).

In order to afford a 90% LTV mortgage, a typical FTB would need to earn £30,800 – 49% higher than current average earnings for a single young adult.

Even then, a 10% deposit of £13,684 is equivalent to 42% of this higher annual income, a major impediment to home purchase without external financial assistance. It is therefore not surprising that 84% of young FTBs are buying with assistance, mostly from parents. This compares to 38% in 2005, according to the CML.

Stuart Beattie, HSBC’s head of mortgages, said: “Our study proves that the aspiration to be a home owner continues to be exceptionally strong. Over 80% of young non-home owners are aspiring to buy a home but are being prevented from doing so due to lack of affordable homes.

“The key to helping buyers back into the market is to help them obtain the cash deposit that responsible lenders require before granting a mortgage.

“To this end, both government and private sector interested parties need to come up with innovative schemes to help aspiring FTBs.”

The report says that government-supported initiatives have helped around 22,000 FTBs a year in each of the last three years.

HSBC is also suggesting that Stamp Duty should be applied to sales, not purchases. This would mean that FTBs would be excused it when the £250,000 stamp duty holiday ends next March.

The bank also suggests that 95% mortgage lending could be deemed prudent, if it could be backed by insurance to cover both lenders and borrowers.

Comments

  • icon

    Funny they should say that. I've been pushing for a similar reform in Australia, except that the seller's duty would be levied on the (real) capital gain. This is better for owners because it would not turn a profitable purchase-and-resale into a loss or magnify a loss. Taxpayers can force such a reform by refusing to buy or sell until the reform is made; see is.gd/psd_strike .

    • 05 April 2011 09:33 AM
  • icon

    What happens when HSBC re-posses a property and then sell it, will they then be happy to pay the stamp duty?
    Perhaps we could swap this 'purchase tax' idea to all areas of life - I'm sure all retailers would welcome paying all the VAT on on all their customers' purchases!

    • 04 April 2011 17:12 PM
  • icon

    Making sellers pay stamp duty would impose yet another burden on small landlords who now have to pay capital gains tax on the entire gain with no allowance for inflation over possibly 20 or 30 years. Who cares? We all should as a lot of landlords, not wealthy by any means, have one or two properties as they didn't trust pensions. Looks like they shouldn't trust Tories either; I don't remember reading about CGT proposals in their manifesto!

    • 04 April 2011 10:43 AM
  • icon

    I suggested this 3 years ago and this could have been implemented by now.
    www.mortgageintroducer.com/mortgages/231516/4/Today%27s_breaking_news/Stamp_duty_proposal_causes_a_stir..htm

    When you think it through, yes, you may have paid Stamp Duty on buying your house, but the bill on buying your next would have been higher in the vast majority of cases. That wouldn't be payable now under these changes.

    Perhaps HSBC could offer me a job seeing how they like my proposals.

    • 04 April 2011 10:18 AM
  • icon

    The proposed new arrangements for the payment of Stamp Duty would seem to me to be somewhat unfair in the short term. The current homeowner may have paid stamp duty when purchasing their property only to have to pay it again when they sell?? A tad unfair really don't you think? I thought we weren't supposed to be taxed twice on the same "income" (although we undoubtedly are with the stealth taxes). Shouldn't that also apply to the same asset??

    • 04 April 2011 09:14 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal