We have 55 guests online 

BSA demands tougher clampdown on claims management firms

Tuesday 10th July 2012

Claims management firms that have been inundating lenders with bogus PPI claims have been labelled the modern day equivalent of ‘highwaymen’.

The Building Societies Association is now calling for the Ministry of Justice to be given more powers to regulate the companies, as claims to mutual lenders continue to rise.

They soared by 247% in the six months to the end of April compared with the previous six months – despite, says the BSA, mutuals having been a very minor player in the PPI scandal.

The Ministry of Justice, which regulates claims management companies, has told them that they must make basic checks to see that PPI was actually sold before a claim is lodged, but the BSA said it has no confidence that rogue firms will comply.

Adrian Coles, director-general of the BSA, said: “Looked at from the perspective of our highly regulated sector, some claims management companies look remarkably like the modern day equivalent of highwaymen.

“The Ministry of Justice warning in August 2011 was clearly ignored.

“If anything, some claims management firms have stepped up their irresponsible, speculative scattergun approach to non-sale claims.

“It is clear that the Ministry of Justice simply does not have the powers that it needs to effectively control the rogue elements in this industry. They do not even have the power to fine.”

Meanwhile, Hinckley & Rugby Building Society said that only one in 32 PPI complaints received within the last three months was from someone who actually had a policy with the society.

Chief executive Chris White said people were simply trying their luck in the hope that building societies or banks might be tempted to pay up without investigating.

He said: “The problem with these bogus complaints is that it is our duty to investigate each one within the FSA rules as though it was genuine. That is a burden on the society in terms of time, cost and staff resource.”


View Comments

(1) Comments | Report Abuse

Added by Duncan Arrowside on 2012-07-10 09:02:16

You also forget to mention that if the accusation is made against an individual IFA or Mortgage Broker, rather than a bank or building society, that individual is required to pay £500 to the Financial Ombudsman Service for them to investigate the complaint, regardless of whether the complaint is subsequently upheld or rejected. I know of one adviser who has been forced out of business having received 100s of complaints via claims management companies who somehow got hold of his client list. The adviser defended the first 25 complaints, and not one was upheld by FOS, but given that it cost him £12,500 just to prove the advice he gave was correct, he decided there was no point continuing in the industry and closed his business making 4 people redundant. These PPI claims firms could end up ruining the adviser industry if they are not regulated properly!!
Post Comments
Please login to post comments.
Email:
Password:
Forgot Password
Post Comments without Login
To prevent spam, please type in result 10 + 4 =  


DISCLAIMER:The views contained in these user comments are not endorsed by Introducer Today(nor its associates and advertisers) in any way and are provided by users who wish to publish their independent opinions on our news.Whilst every effort is made to moderate these comments,due to the instant nature of the posting not all offensive material can be removed instantly.Please help us keep the comments areas tidy by reporting details of any infringements to team@introducertoday.co.uk
Feedback:
If you have any questions or suggestions about this article or our news section, please don't hesitate to contact us.

Editorial Contact Details - Rosalind Renshaw
rosalind.renshaw@introducertoday.co.uk
0845 075 0152
Related News Stories
Most Read News Stories


Feedback Form