FSA's £59.5m fine on Barclays could go to taxpayers
Friday 29th June 2012
The mammoth fine slapped by the FSA on Barclays over its attempts to manipulate interest rates could be paid into the Treasury coffers.
This week’s £59.5m fine on Barclays was the largest the FSA has ever imposed.
Until now, fines collected by the FSA have been retained and go towards reducing the annual costs levied on financial firms.
But Chancellor George Osborne said yesterday that it should be taxpayers, not the financial industry, that benefits.
He told the Commons: “Under the previous Government’s regime, fines payed to the FSA are used to reduce the annual levy other financial institutions are asked to pay. I am far from convinced that in all cases this is the best use of the money.
“We are considering amendments to the Financial Services Bill that will ensure fines of this nature go to help the taxpaying public, not the financial industry.”
“I do not think it is appropriate other financial institutions, the banks, benefit from a lower FSA levy.”
Osborne said he had asked Treasury officials to look at whether the move could be specifically applied to the Barclays fine.
(2) Comments | Report Abuse
| |
David B - absolutely and entirely agree. Typical politician seeking to have it both ways and try to manipulate situation to advantage.
By Mr Osbourne's now logic can we anticiape that the tax raised on vehicle excise duty will now be used to improve the road structrue as it was intended to and as it should be. I await the deafening silence from all in Downing Street |
| |
If it is "not appropriate" for other financial institutions to benefit from a lower FSA levy, then could George explain why it has been accepted practice for the FSA to penalise decent firms for the malpractice of others?
I've never sold a Keydata policy nor Arch Cru, yet I still had to cough up to cover the costs. So I would like to disagree wholeheartedly with Mr Osbourne, because I think the Barclays fine (and any more applied to the other offending banks) should go towards reducing the levy I have to pay. |
DISCLAIMER:The views contained in these user comments are not endorsed by Introducer Today(nor its associates and advertisers) in any way and are provided by users who wish to publish their independent opinions on our news.Whilst every effort is made to moderate these comments,due to the instant nature of the posting not all offensive material can be removed instantly.Please help us keep the comments areas tidy by reporting details of any infringements to team@introducertoday.co.uk
Editorial Contact Details - Rosalind Renshaw
rosalind.renshaw@introducertoday.co.uk
Lenders jostle to launch lowest-ever fixed deals
Mortgage Advice Bureau reports surge of activity
Hopes for self-build market dragged down by lenders' anxieties







Newsletter Sign Up
