x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by rosalind renshaw

Mortgage lenders, house builders and industry leaders are being summoned to an emergency meeting to discuss the plight of first-time buyers.

The meeting is being called by the Government which says that first-time buyers have been frozen out, with an impact on the whole of the rest of the housing market.

Deputy prime minister Nick Clegg said that the crisis is ‘hampering social mobility’.

The summit will be held in London on February 15 and chaired by housing minister Grant Shapps.

Problems faced by first-time buyers include the large debts with which they leave university, the high deposits routinely required by lenders, and the increasing likelihood of interest rates rising.

According to the Council of Mortgage Lenders, the proportion of first-time buyers under the age of 30 who are able to buy without parental help has fallen from 63% five years ago to 17%.

In the last three quarters of 2010, the proportion of mortgages granted to first-time buyers with deposits of less than 10% fell to two in 100, down from almost six out of ten in 2005.

The average age of an unassisted first-time buyer is now 37.

Treasury spokesman Lord Oakeshott accused mortgage lenders of being virtually ‘on strike’ when it came to lending to first-time buyers.

He said: “The bankers’ doors are shut to first-time buyers without a big helping hand from the Bank of Mum and Dad.”

Comments

  • icon

    After 3yrs and 4 months of renting in London I will have expended £42400 on rental fees.

    At 28 and married why can't we access mortgage products ? We cannot save due to rising rental fees and have been priced out of the housing market due to inflation.

    The figures I quoted would be equal to repayments of £1060 PM over 25 years with borrowing of £318000 (no adjustments made for interest).

    Surely a professional couple with prospects capable of this expenditure are not a hugh risk and would enhance mobility in the housing market, in reality we would not need £318000 for a property but the figures speak for themselves.

    • 14 February 2011 17:43 PM
  • icon

    Suitable FTB property is occupied by FTB themselves and in negative equity or same value at best.
    Until you get to those moving for aspirational reasons there is a similar mess and confusion, a complete mess.
    Last time we had this same situation loans of 100%+ were allowed to help FTBs out of negative equity move on with their lives and we all know where this ended.
    Until we have Fixed Rate only loans for 75%+ LTV we will continue to have this problem recurring on a regular basis.

    • 31 January 2011 09:42 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal