x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Written by rosalind renshaw

The Mortgage Market Review could have a ‘profound and bad’ effect on the prospects for many people’s lives and also Britain’s wider economy.

The warning was sounded in a House of Commons debate on MMR by Tory MP Robert Syms.

He also warned that the FSA might be concentrating on the ‘wrong problem’.

He said that the current financial crisis and liquidity issues were primarily the result of a global problem: “They are not a result of a dysfunctional and widely irresponsible residential mortgage market.”

But Mark Hoban, financial secretary to the Treasury, defended the MMR, calling it an “essential step” to protect consumers and lenders. 

He insisted: “It is clear that mortgage regulation failed by allowing an unsustainable boom in lending and increasing house prices, followed by the inevitable crash. We do not want to see that repeated.”

Syms said: “The market failures that the MMR is designed to address affects only a small number of lenders that were in the market. Some of these are no longer active.”

He said the FSA proposals were based on the patronising view that customers need protecting from themselves. He also said that borrowers with short-term difficulties should be able to stay in the home-ownership market and be able to remortgage.

Syms said: “If we get it wrong, we will all find people in our surgeries who cannot understand why a few years ago they got a mortgage and now they cannot.”

He also said it was important that the MMR allowed smaller lenders to continue to operate in the market.

John Woodcock, MP for Barrow and Furness, agreed, saying that smaller lenders such as his own local Furness Building Society are not ‘playing fast and loose’ and feel they are being penalised by the proposals.

Marcus Jones, MP for Nuneaton, also expressed concern about a lack of availability of mortgages up to 95% LTV.

He said: “The bigger issue is about lenders ensuring that they do not over-expose themselves to such loans. They should keep them proportionate within their mortgage book to make sure first-time buyers gain that vital access to mortgage finance.”

But Hoban countered by saying there was a lot of concern based on misinformation about the MMR. He added that nothing was yet set in stone.

He said: “Increased lending can force up house prices beyond the reach of those who want to get on to or move up the housing ladder, putting home ownership further and further out of reach for many.”

He added: “We do not want lenders to put their solvency at risk through aggressive lending.”

Comments

  • icon

    The FSA was originally set up to bring about more choice and better advice for the general public. With the MMR and RDR, their will be fewer IFAs and Mortgage Brokers that can give that advice. This only means that Joe Public will be left with the banks to seek quality advice from, this to me means that the FSA have failed on every level that they were originally set up to achieve. Yes, I am a disgruntled mortgage broker that probably won't be here next year.

    • 19 January 2011 14:13 PM
  • icon

    I always wonder what goes on in someones head when they place more importance on how someone spells something rather than the actual content. Pretty much like the FSA really, focusing on things that do not matter rtaher than dealing with real issues.

    • 19 January 2011 13:54 PM
  • icon

    MMR, RDR, I'm getting bored to be honest.

    • 19 January 2011 11:52 AM
  • icon

    Don't you just love people who can spell neither "experience" nor "services" lecturing others on pig ignorance? Hardly surprising their views are not taken into account...

    • 19 January 2011 10:46 AM
  • icon

    I have 30 years experiance in financial sevices Mr Hoban and the other idiots at the FSA do not.
    Perhaps they should ask a group of people with experiance to guide them before they destroy financial services by their pig ignorance.

    • 19 January 2011 10:16 AM
  • icon

    Mr Hoban has again proved that he is a clueless puppet controlled by the FSA. If anyone in business showed his level of ineptitude and total lack of understanding of the way the system works he'd simply be sacked! Can we have someone with experience to work with!

    • 19 January 2011 10:05 AM
MovePal MovePal MovePal